Cat 320 vs Komatsu PC200: Which One Is Right for You?

When choosing a mid-size excavator, two models dominate contractor conversations: the Cat 320 vs Komatsu PC200. Both machines are proven workhorses, known for durability, fuel efficiency, and consistent performance on construction, mining, and earthmoving projects. But which one is the better match for your jobsite? In this comparison, we break down their strengths so you can confidently decide.

Performance & Power

The Cat 320 vs Komatsu PC200 comparison starts with engine performance.
The Cat 320 typically delivers slightly higher horsepower, offering faster cycle times and strong digging forces. This makes it ideal for operators who prioritize productivity on demanding sites.
The Komatsu PC200, on the other hand, is known for smooth operation and excellent hydraulic precision. Its power delivery is predictable and easy to control, making it appealing for fine grading and long-hour shifts.

Fuel Efficiency

Fuel consumption is a major factor when evaluating the Cat 320 vs Komatsu PC200.
Komatsu machines generally earn praise for exceptional fuel economy due to intelligent hydraulic technology. This helps reduce operating costs over the machine’s lifetime.
Caterpillar’s advanced engine management also offers solid efficiency, but the Cat 320 often focuses more on performance than minimum fuel burn. Contractors who balance productivity with fuel savings may prefer Komatsu.

Comfort & Operator Experience

When comparing operator comfort between the Cat 320 vs Komatsu PC200, both brands deliver modern, ergonomic cabs with good visibility and digital monitoring systems.
However, Caterpillar usually edges ahead with a more refined cab layout, easier joystick responsiveness, and better overall user experience. Komatsu cabins are reliable and comfortable but slightly more traditional in layout and controls.

Durability & Maintenance

Durability is essential in any Cat 320 vs Komatsu PC200 evaluation.
Caterpillar machines are widely known for their strong frames and long service life, especially in harsh conditions. Parts availability is excellent worldwide, although repair costs can be slightly higher.
Komatsu offers outstanding reliability with fewer electronic issues and simpler maintenance procedures. Parts costs are often lower, making it a great choice for cost-conscious fleets.

Resale Value

In terms of resale strength, the Cat 320 vs Komatsu PC200 comparison shows Caterpillar typically has the advantage. Cat equipment holds value better in most markets due to brand reputation and global demand. Komatsu resale value is strong but varies more by region.

Which One Should You Choose?

If your priority is raw power, operator comfort, and strong resale value, the Cat 320 is likely the better fit.
If you want lower fuel costs, easier maintenance, and proven reliability, the Komatsu PC200 may be the smarter long-term investment.
Ultimately, your decision between the Cat 320 vs Komatsu PC200 depends on your terrain, workload, and business priorities.